Is the 2023 Land Rover Range Rover a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 SUVs
4thof 19
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 40.9 cu ft.
- 4th of 19 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 17), towing (1st of 19).
- Weakest: price (18th of 21).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $104,500 | 18th of 21 | 15% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 4th of 14 | 62% | |
| Most horsepower | 523 hp | 13th of 20 | 26% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 40.9 cu ft | 4th of 19 | 83% | |
| Rear legroom | 48.0 in | 1st of 17 | 100% | |
| Max towing | 8,200 lb | 1st of 19 | 100% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
Show all 19
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 21 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree