Is the 2021 Land Rover Range Rover a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 15 SUVs
7thof 15
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 31.8 cu ft.
- 7th of 15 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 10), mpg (1st of 14).
- Weakest: price (13th of 16).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $92,000 | 13th of 16 | 20% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 1st of 14 | 92% | |
| Most horsepower | 557 hp | 10th of 16 | 40% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 31.8 cu ft | 7th of 15 | 57% | |
| Rear legroom | 46.8 in | 1st of 10 | 100% | |
| Max towing | 7,716 lb | 2nd of 15 | 86% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- BMW X7 48.6 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 15
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
No figure: BMW X6.
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 16 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree