Is the 2024 Land Rover Range Rover a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
4thof 22
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 40.9 cu ft.
- 4th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 17), towing (1st of 21).
- Weakest: price (19th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $107,400 | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 3rd of 15 | 79% | |
| Most horsepower | 606 hp | 11th of 23 | 55% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 40.9 cu ft | 4th of 22 | 86% | |
| Rear legroom | 48.0 in | 1st of 17 | 100% | |
| Max towing | 8,200 lb | 1st of 21 | 100% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 33.9 cu ft
Show all 22
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 31.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Lotus Eletre, VinFast VF9.
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree