Skip to content
GizmoDriver

Is the 2022 Land Rover Range Rover a good car?

Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 16 SUVs

3rdof 16

  • Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
  • Cargo behind rear seats: 40.9 cu ft.
  • 3rd of 16 SUVs close in size and price.
  • Best: rear legroom (1st of 12), cargo (3rd of 16).
  • Weakest: price (14th of 17).
  • Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.

Pick a model

Subject
CLASS OF 2022 · SUVSModel XTesla Model XLXLexus LXRange …Land Rover Range RoverSQ7Audi SQ7iXBMW iXQ8Audi Q8RS Q8Audi RS Q8e-tronAudi e-trone-tron…Audi e-tron SRange …Land Rover Range Rover SportCayennePorsche CayenneX6 MBMW X6 MLevanteMaserati LevanteCayenn…Porsche Cayenne CoupeR1SRivian R1SX7BMW X7BMW X6No number3rd of 16
17 SUVs from 2022, picked by size and price. Back row leads. Tap a car to see its figure.
Report card: 2022 Land Rover Range Rover in a class of 17
SubjectFigurePlaceBeatsClass
Starting price$93,22514th of 1719%
Best combined mpg21 mpg2nd of 1255%
Most horsepower557 hp10th of 1640%
Cargo behind rear seats40.9 cu ft3rd of 1687%
Rear legroom48.0 in1st of 12100%
Max towing7,716 lb2nd of 1586%

Roll call: cargo behind rear seats

  1. Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
  2. Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
  3. Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
  4. Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
  5. BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
  6. Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
  7. Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
  8. Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
Show all 16
  1. Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
  2. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
  3. Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
  4. BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
  5. Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
  6. Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
  7. Rivian R1S 17.7 cu ft
  8. BMW X7 12.8 cu ft

No figure: BMW X6.

SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 17 closest in size and price.

What this cannot tell you

Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.

Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.

How values are checked