Is the 2022 Audi e-tron S a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
12thof 21
- No. Top half on 1 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 28.5 cu ft.
- 12th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (6th of 17), cargo (12th of 21).
- Weakest: towing (17th of 21, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $84,800 | 16th of 22 | 29% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 28.5 cu ft | 12th of 21 | 40% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.1 in | 6th of 17 | 63% | |
| Max towing | 4,000 lb | 17th of 21 | 15% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
Show all 21
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 17.7 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
No figure: BMW X6.
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree