Is the 2023 Audi e-tron S a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
13thof 23
- No. Top half on 1 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 28.5 cu ft.
- 13th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (6th of 20), cargo (13th of 23).
- Weakest: towing (19th of 19).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $88,200 | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 28.5 cu ft | 13th of 23 | 41% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.1 in | 6th of 20 | 68% | |
| Max towing | 3,300 lb | 19th of 19 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
Show all 23
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Fisker Ocean 16.8 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree