Is the 2023 Audi SQ7 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
6thof 20
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 35.7 cu ft.
- 6th of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (6th of 20), rear legroom (9th of 18).
- Weakest: mpg (13th of 15).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $90,200 | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 13th of 15 | 14% | |
| Most horsepower | 500 hp | 16th of 21 | 25% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 35.7 cu ft | 6th of 20 | 74% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.8 in | 9th of 18 | 53% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 4th of 20 | 53% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
Show all 20
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree