Is the 2023 Audi SQ8 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
13thof 22
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 30.5 cu ft.
- 13th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (8th of 20), cargo (13th of 22).
- Weakest: price (20th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $95,500 | 20th of 24 | 17% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 9th of 18 | 29% | |
| Most horsepower | 500 hp | 17th of 23 | 23% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 30.5 cu ft | 13th of 22 | 43% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.2 in | 8th of 20 | 63% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 10th of 22 | 38% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 94.1 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer L 88.8 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer 70.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
Show all 22
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X3 M 28.7 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 23.0 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree