Is the 2020 Audi SQ7 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 SUVs
16thof 17
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 14.2 cu ft.
- 16th of 17 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (6th of 12), price (11th of 17).
- Weakest: cargo (16th of 17).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $84,800 | 11th of 17 | 38% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 9th of 15 | 29% | |
| Most horsepower | 500 hp | 12th of 17 | 31% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 14.2 cu ft | 16th of 17 | 6% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.8 in | 6th of 12 | 55% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 5th of 14 | 38% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
Show all 17
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 15.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 17 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree