Skip to content
GizmoDriver

Is the 2020 Land Rover Range Rover a good car?

Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 SUVs

5thof 17

  • Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
  • Cargo behind rear seats: 31.8 cu ft.
  • 5th of 17 SUVs close in size and price.
  • Best: rear legroom (1st of 12), mpg (1st of 15).
  • Weakest: price (14th of 17).
  • Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.

Pick a model

Subject
CLASS OF 2020 · SUVSModel XTesla Model XLXLexus LXLand C…Toyota Land CruiserG-ClassMercedes-Benz G-ClassRange …Land Rover Range RoverQ8Audi Q8RS Q8Audi RS Q8Range …Land Rover Range Rover SportX6BMW X6e-tronAudi e-tronCayennePorsche CayenneX6 MBMW X6 MLevanteMaserati LevanteCayenn…Porsche Cayenne CoupeEscala…Cadillac EscaladeSQ7Audi SQ7X7BMW X75th of 17
17 SUVs from 2020, picked by size and price. Back row leads. Tap a car to see its figure.
Report card: 2020 Land Rover Range Rover in a class of 17
SubjectFigurePlaceBeatsClass
Starting price$90,90014th of 1719%
Best combined mpg24 mpg1st of 1593%
Most horsepower557 hp9th of 1750%
Cargo behind rear seats31.8 cu ft5th of 1775%
Rear legroom46.8 in1st of 12100%
Max towing7,716 lb3rd of 1477%

Roll call: cargo behind rear seats

  1. Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
  2. Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
  3. Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
  4. Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
  5. Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
  6. Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
  7. Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
  8. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
Show all 17
  1. BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
  2. Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
  3. Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
  4. BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
  5. Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
  6. Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
  7. Cadillac Escalade 15.2 cu ft
  8. Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
  9. BMW X7 12.8 cu ft

SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 17 closest in size and price.

What this cannot tell you

Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.

Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.

How values are checked