Is the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
4thof 22
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 40.9 cu ft.
- 4th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 19), towing (1st of 18).
- Weakest: price (17th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $113,300 | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 4th of 15 | 64% | |
| Most horsepower | 607 hp | 14th of 22 | 38% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 40.9 cu ft | 4th of 22 | 86% | |
| Rear legroom | 48.0 in | 1st of 19 | 100% | |
| Max towing | 8,200 lb | 1st of 18 | 100% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lucid Gravity 50.6 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 37.1 cu ft
- GMC Hummer EV SUV 35.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
Show all 22
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 31.9 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 Coupe 29.3 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.6 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- Cadillac VISTIQ 15.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree