Is the 2023 BMW X5 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
18thof 22
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.0 cu ft.
- 18th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (7th of 23), towing (8th of 22).
- Weakest: mpg (16th of 18, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $108,900 | 21st of 24 | 13% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 16th of 18 | 6% | |
| Most horsepower | 600 hp | 7th of 23 | 68% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.0 cu ft | 18th of 22 | 19% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | 7,716 lb | 8th of 22 | 62% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 94.1 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer L 88.8 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer 70.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
Show all 22
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 23.0 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree