Is the 2025 BMW X5 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
12thof 22
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 33.9 cu ft.
- 12th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (9th of 22), cargo (12th of 22).
- Weakest: mpg (13th of 15, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $127,200 | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 13th of 15 | 7% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 9th of 22 | 57% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 33.9 cu ft | 12th of 22 | 48% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.4 in | 17th of 19 | 11% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 94.1 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer L 88.8 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 69.9 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade IQ 69.1 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
Show all 22
- GMC Hummer EV SUV 35.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 33.9 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Lotus Eletre 24.0 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree