Is the 2022 BMW X5 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
14thof 22
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.0 cu ft.
- 14th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (6th of 21), towing (7th of 20).
- Weakest: mpg (15th of 18, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $106,100 | 18th of 22 | 19% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 15th of 18 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 600 hp | 6th of 21 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.0 cu ft | 14th of 22 | 38% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | 7,716 lb | 7th of 20 | 63% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 94.1 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer 70.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
Show all 22
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 23.0 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 17.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree