Is the 2020 BMW X5 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 SUVs
11thof 18
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.0 cu ft.
- 11th of 18 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (3rd of 18), towing (5th of 15).
- Weakest: price (15th of 18).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $105,100 | 15th of 18 | 18% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 11th of 16 | 20% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 3rd of 18 | 82% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.0 cu ft | 11th of 18 | 41% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | 7,716 lb | 5th of 15 | 64% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 39.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 18
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 23.0 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 15.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 18 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree