Is the 2020 Audi RS Q8 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 11 SUVs
6thof 11
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 30.5 cu ft.
- 6th of 11 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (3rd of 9), power (5th of 11).
- Weakest: price (9th of 11).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $113,000 | 9th of 11 | 20% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 5th of 9 | 38% | |
| Most horsepower | 591 hp | 5th of 11 | 60% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 30.5 cu ft | 6th of 11 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.2 in | 3rd of 9 | 75% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 3rd of 9 | 50% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
Show all 11
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 11 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree