Is the 2020 BMW X6 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 13 SUVs
8thof 13
- No. Top half on 1 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.5 cu ft.
- 8th of 13 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (4th of 13), cargo (8th of 13).
- Weakest: price (10th of 13).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $108,600 | 10th of 13 | 25% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 7th of 11 | 30% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 4th of 13 | 75% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.5 cu ft | 8th of 13 | 33% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
Show all 13
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 13 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree