Is the 2024 BMW X6 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 14 SUVs
9thof 14
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.4 cu ft.
- 9th of 14 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (4th of 14), cargo (9th of 14).
- Weakest: rear legroom (10th of 10).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $127,200 | 13th of 15 | 14% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 6th of 10 | 22% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 4th of 14 | 69% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.4 cu ft | 9th of 14 | 38% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.7 in | 10th of 10 | 0% | |
| Max towing | 1,653 lb | 12th of 12 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 33.9 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
Show all 14
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
No figure: Lotus Eletre.
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 15 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree