Is the 2026 BMW X6 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 11 SUVs
9thof 11
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.4 cu ft.
- 9th of 11 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (6th of 11), price (8th of 11).
- Weakest: rear legroom (10th of 10).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $136,100 | 8th of 11 | 30% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 8th of 9 | 13% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 6th of 11 | 50% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.4 cu ft | 9th of 11 | 20% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.7 in | 10th of 10 | 0% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 37.1 cu ft
- GMC Hummer EV SUV 35.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 11
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 11 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree