Is the 2026 Mercedes-Benz G-Class a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 6 SUVs
2ndof 6
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 38.1 cu ft.
- 2nd of 6 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 6), mpg (3rd of 5).
- Weakest: price (6th of 6).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $153,900 | 6th of 6 | 0% | |
| Best combined mpg | 18 mpg | 3rd of 5 | 50% | |
| Most horsepower | 579 hp | 6th of 6 | 0% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 38.1 cu ft | 2nd of 6 | 80% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.5 in | 4th of 5 | 25% | |
| Max towing | 7,000 lb | 4th of 5 | 25% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 37.1 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 6 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree