Is the 2021 Mercedes-Benz G-Class a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 5 SUVs
1stof 5
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 38.1 cu ft.
- 1st of 5 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 5), mpg (2nd of 5).
- Weakest: price (4th of 5).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $131,750 | 4th of 5 | 25% | |
| Best combined mpg | 18 mpg | 2nd of 5 | 75% | |
| Most horsepower | 577 hp | 3rd of 5 | 50% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 38.1 cu ft | 1st of 5 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.5 in | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | 7,000 lb | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Aston Martin DBX 22.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 5 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree