Is the 2024 Mercedes-Benz G-Class a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 10 SUVs
2ndof 10
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 38.1 cu ft.
- 2nd of 10 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 10), towing (3rd of 8).
- Weakest: mpg (8th of 9, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $143,000 | 8th of 11 | 30% | |
| Best combined mpg | 14 mpg | 8th of 9 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 585 hp | 8th of 10 | 22% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 38.1 cu ft | 2nd of 10 | 89% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.5 in | 6th of 7 | 17% | |
| Max towing | 7,000 lb | 3rd of 8 | 57% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 33.9 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Aston Martin DBX 22.5 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
Show all 10
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
No figure: Lotus Eletre.
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 11 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree