Is the 2024 BMW XM a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 8 SUVs
7thof 8
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.6 cu ft.
- 7th of 8 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (1st of 8), rear legroom (4th of 7).
- Weakest: mpg (7th of 8, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $159,000 | 7th of 9 | 25% | |
| Best combined mpg | 14 mpg | 7th of 8 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 738 hp | 1st of 8 | 100% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.6 cu ft | 7th of 8 | 14% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.3 in | 4th of 7 | 50% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 33.9 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Aston Martin DBX 22.5 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
No figure: Lotus Eletre.
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 9 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree