Is the 2023 BMW XM a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 7 SUVs
6thof 7
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.6 cu ft.
- 6th of 7 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (3rd of 7), rear legroom (3rd of 6).
- Weakest: mpg (6th of 7, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $159,000 | 4th of 7 | 50% | |
| Best combined mpg | 14 mpg | 6th of 7 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 644 hp | 3rd of 7 | 67% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.6 cu ft | 6th of 7 | 17% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.3 in | 3rd of 6 | 60% | |
| Max towing | 5,952 lb | 4th of 5 | 25% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Aston Martin DBX 22.5 cu ft
- Lamborghini Urus 21.8 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 7 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree