Is the 2023 Mercedes-Benz G-Class a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 6 SUVs
2ndof 6
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 38.1 cu ft.
- 2nd of 6 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 6), towing (3rd of 5).
- Weakest: mpg (5th of 6, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $139,900 | 5th of 7 | 33% | |
| Best combined mpg | 14 mpg | 5th of 6 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 585 hp | 5th of 7 | 33% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 38.1 cu ft | 2nd of 6 | 80% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.5 in | 5th of 6 | 20% | |
| Max towing | 7,000 lb | 3rd of 5 | 50% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 7 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree