Is the 2023 Audi RS Q8 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 10 SUVs
5thof 10
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 30.5 cu ft.
- 5th of 10 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (3rd of 8), power (4th of 10).
- Weakest: price (9th of 11).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $125,800 | 9th of 11 | 20% | |
| Best combined mpg | 16 mpg | 6th of 9 | 38% | |
| Most horsepower | 591 hp | 4th of 10 | 67% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 30.5 cu ft | 5th of 10 | 56% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.2 in | 3rd of 8 | 71% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 3rd of 10 | 56% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
Show all 10
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 11 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree