Skip to content
GizmoDriver

Is the 2023 BMW X6 M a good car?

Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 15 SUVs

11thof 15

  • No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
  • Cargo behind rear seats: 27.4 cu ft.
  • 11th of 15 SUVs close in size and price.
  • Best: power (5th of 16), cargo (11th of 15).
  • Weakest: rear legroom (13th of 14).
  • Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.

Pick a model

Subject
CLASS OF 2023 · SUVSModel XTesla Model XR1SRivian R1SLXLexus LXRange …Land Rover Range RoverG-ClassMercedes-Benz G-ClassSQ7Audi SQ7iXBMW iXRange …Land Rover Range Rover SportRS Q8Audi RS Q8e-tron…Audi e-tron SX6 MBMW X6 MLevanteMaserati LevanteCayenn…Porsche Cayenne CoupeXMBMW XMX4 MBMW X4 MMercedes-Benz EQE SUVMercedes-Benz EQS SUVNo number11th of 15
17 SUVs from 2023, picked by size and price. Back row leads. Tap a car to see its figure.
Report card: 2023 BMW X6 M in a class of 17
SubjectFigurePlaceBeatsClass
Starting price$113,70014th of 1719%
Best combined mpg15 mpg9th of 1120%
Most horsepower600 hp5th of 1673%
Cargo behind rear seats27.4 cu ft11th of 1529%
Rear legroom35.7 in13th of 148%
Max towingN/AN/AN/A

Roll call: cargo behind rear seats

  1. Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
  2. Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
  3. Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
  4. Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
  5. Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
  6. Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
  7. BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
  8. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
Show all 15
  1. Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
  2. Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
  3. BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
  4. Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
  5. Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
  6. BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
  7. BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft

No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.

SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 17 closest in size and price.

What this cannot tell you

Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.

Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.

How values are checked