Is the 2025 BMW X6 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 12 SUVs
7thof 12
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.4 cu ft.
- 7th of 12 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (5th of 12), cargo (7th of 12).
- Weakest: rear legroom (9th of 9).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $132,100 | 9th of 12 | 27% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 7th of 8 | 14% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 5th of 12 | 64% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.4 cu ft | 7th of 12 | 45% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.7 in | 9th of 9 | 0% | |
| Max towing | 1,653 lb | 10th of 10 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
Show all 12
- Lotus Eletre 24.0 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 12 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree