Is the 2026 BMW XM a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 8 SUVs
7thof 8
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.6 cu ft.
- 7th of 8 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (2nd of 8), rear legroom (3rd of 7).
- Weakest: mpg (7th of 7).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $159,600 | 7th of 8 | 14% | |
| Best combined mpg | 14 mpg | 7th of 7 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 738 hp | 2nd of 8 | 86% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.6 cu ft | 7th of 8 | 14% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.3 in | 3rd of 7 | 67% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 37.1 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 8 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree