Is the 2024 BMW X5 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 15 SUVs
6thof 15
- Top half on 2 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 33.9 cu ft.
- 6th of 15 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (5th of 15), cargo (6th of 15).
- Weakest: mpg (7th of 11, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $122,300 | 12th of 16 | 27% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 7th of 11 | 20% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 5th of 15 | 64% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 33.9 cu ft | 6th of 15 | 64% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 31.9 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 15
- Audi SQ8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
No figure: Lotus Eletre.
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 16 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree