Is the 2026 BMW X5 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 SUVs
10thof 19
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 33.9 cu ft.
- 10th of 19 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (10th of 19), power (10th of 19).
- Weakest: mpg (12th of 14, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $131,000 | 15th of 19 | 22% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 12th of 14 | 8% | |
| Most horsepower | 617 hp | 10th of 19 | 44% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 33.9 cu ft | 10th of 19 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.4 in | 15th of 17 | 13% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 94.1 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 69.9 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz G-Class 38.1 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 37.1 cu ft
- GMC Hummer EV SUV 35.9 cu ft
Show all 19
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- BMW X5 M 33.9 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade IQL 24.2 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade IQ 23.6 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 19 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree