Is the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 14 SUVs
9thof 14
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.4 cu ft.
- 9th of 14 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (2nd of 8), cargo (9th of 14).
- Weakest: price (13th of 14).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49,900 | 13th of 14 | 8% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 9th of 10 | 11% | |
| Most horsepower | 246 hp | 13th of 14 | 8% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.4 cu ft | 9th of 14 | 38% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.8 in | 9th of 13 | 33% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 2nd of 8 | 71% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
Show all 14
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 14 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree