Skip to content
GizmoDriver

Is the 2023 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a good car?

Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 16 SUVs

8thof 16

  • Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
  • Cargo behind rear seats: 21.5 cu ft.
  • 8th of 16 SUVs close in size and price.
  • Best: power (6th of 16), towing (3rd of 13).
  • Weakest: mpg (11th of 13, tied with 2).
  • Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.

Pick a model

Subject
CLASS OF 2023 · SUVSHornetDodge HornetX1BMW X1GV60Genesis GV60Q3Audi Q3TonaleAlfa Romeo TonaleE PACEJaguar E PACEX2BMW X2Range …Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueMX-30Mazda MX-30Kona NHyundai Kona NUXLexus UXXC40Volvo XC40XC40 R…Volvo XC40 RechargeGLAMercedes-Benz GLAC40 Re…Volvo C40 Recharge500XFIAT 500X8th of 16
16 SUVs from 2023, picked by size and price. Back row leads. Tap a car to see its figure.
Report card: 2023 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque in a class of 16
SubjectFigurePlaceBeatsClass
Starting price$45,00012th of 1627%
Best combined mpg23 mpg11th of 130%
Most horsepower296 hp6th of 1667%
Cargo behind rear seats21.5 cu ft8th of 1653%
Rear legroom33.8 in13th of 1514%
Max towing3,968 lb3rd of 1367%

Roll call: cargo behind rear seats

  1. Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
  2. BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
  3. Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
  4. Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
  5. Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
  6. Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
  7. BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
  8. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
Show all 16
  1. Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
  2. Hyundai Kona N 19.2 cu ft
  3. Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
  4. Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
  5. Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
  6. Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
  7. Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
  8. FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft

SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 16 closest in size and price.

What this cannot tell you

Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.

Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.

How values are checked