Is the 2021 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 9 SUVs
5thof 9
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.5 cu ft.
- 5th of 9 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (1st of 7), cargo (5th of 9).
- Weakest: mpg (9th of 9).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $43,300 | 8th of 9 | 13% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 9th of 9 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 246 hp | 7th of 9 | 25% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.5 cu ft | 5th of 9 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.8 in | 8th of 9 | 13% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 1st of 7 | 67% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
Show all 9
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 9 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree