Is the 2020 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 7 SUVs
5thof 7
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.5 cu ft.
- 5th of 7 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (1st of 5), power (2nd of 7).
- Weakest: price (7th of 7).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $42,650 | 7th of 7 | 0% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 6th of 7 | 17% | |
| Most horsepower | 296 hp | 2nd of 7 | 67% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.5 cu ft | 5th of 7 | 33% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.8 in | 5th of 6 | 20% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 1st of 5 | 75% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 24.2 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 7 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree