Is the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 13 SUVs
7thof 13
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.4 cu ft.
- 7th of 13 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (1st of 9), cargo (7th of 13).
- Weakest: mpg (10th of 10).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49,700 | 10th of 13 | 25% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 10th of 10 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 246 hp | 11th of 13 | 17% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.4 cu ft | 7th of 13 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.8 in | 10th of 12 | 18% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 1st of 9 | 88% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
Show all 13
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 13 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree