Is the 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 12 SUVs
7thof 12
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.4 cu ft.
- 7th of 12 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (2nd of 10), cargo (7th of 12).
- Weakest: mpg (10th of 10).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49,900 | 9th of 12 | 27% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 10th of 10 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 246 hp | 9th of 12 | 18% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.4 cu ft | 7th of 12 | 45% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.8 in | 10th of 11 | 10% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 2nd of 10 | 67% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
Show all 12
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 12 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree