Is the 2024 Jaguar E PACE a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 SUVs
12thof 18
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 22.4 cu ft.
- 12th of 18 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (3rd of 14), price (12th of 18).
- Weakest: rear legroom (15th of 17).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49,400 | 12th of 18 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 11th of 13 | 17% | |
| Most horsepower | 246 hp | 13th of 18 | 18% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 22.4 cu ft | 12th of 18 | 35% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.1 in | 15th of 17 | 13% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 3rd of 14 | 69% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.2 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
Show all 18
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 18 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree