Is the 2023 Jaguar E PACE a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 SUVs
10thof 19
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 22.4 cu ft.
- 10th of 19 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (4th of 14), cargo (10th of 19).
- Weakest: mpg (10th of 13, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $48,000 | 14th of 19 | 28% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 10th of 13 | 8% | |
| Most horsepower | 246 hp | 13th of 19 | 28% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 22.4 cu ft | 10th of 19 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.1 in | 16th of 19 | 17% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 4th of 14 | 62% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
Show all 19
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona N 19.2 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 19 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree