Is the 2020 Jaguar E PACE a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 11 SUVs
5thof 11
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 24.2 cu ft.
- 5th of 11 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (3rd of 11), cargo (5th of 11).
- Weakest: towing (8th of 8).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $39,950 | 10th of 11 | 10% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 8th of 11 | 30% | |
| Most horsepower | 296 hp | 3rd of 11 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 24.2 cu ft | 5th of 11 | 60% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.1 in | 8th of 10 | 22% | |
| Max towing | 1,653 lb | 8th of 8 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 24.2 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
Show all 11
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 11 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree