Is the 2020 Acura RDX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
14thof 23
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 29.5 cu ft.
- 14th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (10th of 23), price (11th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (21st of 23, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $37,800 | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 13th of 23 | 32% | |
| Most horsepower | 272 hp | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 29.5 cu ft | 14th of 23 | 41% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.4 in | 10th of 23 | 59% | |
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | 21st of 23 | 5% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model Y 68.0 cu ft
- Buick Envision 57.3 cu ft
- Honda Passport 50.5 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 39.3 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.0 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
Show all 23
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 36.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 35.9 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 33.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.2 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- BMW X3 28.7 cu ft
- Audi Q5 25.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.1 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.8 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.6 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz GLC.
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree