Is the 2022 Acura RDX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
11thof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 29.5 cu ft.
- 11th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (7th of 24), cargo (11th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (19th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $40,600 | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 10th of 21 | 40% | |
| Most horsepower | 272 hp | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 29.5 cu ft | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 11th of 24 | 35% | |
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | 19th of 20 | 5% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
Show all 24
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Nexo 29.6 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota Venza 28.8 cu ft
- BMW X3 28.7 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 25.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree