Is the 2022 Lexus RX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
20thof 22
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.0 cu ft.
- 20th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 23), price (14th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (20th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $45,920 | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Best combined mpg | 30 mpg | 2nd of 23 | 95% | |
| Most horsepower | 308 hp | 16th of 24 | 30% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.0 cu ft | 20th of 22 | 10% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 15th of 22 | 33% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 18th of 24 | 17% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
Show all 22
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.1 cu ft
- Chevrolet Blazer 30.5 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Lexus RX 16.0 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 12.8 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
No figure: BMW X6, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree