Is the 2025 Lexus RX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
17thof 22
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 29.6 cu ft.
- 17th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 19), power (10th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (17th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $48,975 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 36 mpg | 2nd of 19 | 89% | |
| Most horsepower | 366 hp | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 29.6 cu ft | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.4 in | 14th of 22 | 29% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 15th of 23 | 27% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota 4Runner 48.4 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 37.5 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 36.4 cu ft
Show all 22
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 30.9 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer S 30.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Blazer 30.5 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Lexus RX 29.6 cu ft
- Cadillac OPTIQ 26.0 cu ft
- Toyota Crown Signia 25.8 cu ft
- Honda Prologue 25.2 cu ft
- Polestar 3 17.1 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 14.6 cu ft
No figure: Genesis GV80, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree