Is the 2025 BMW X5 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
7thof 22
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 33.9 cu ft.
- 7th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (4th of 15), cargo (7th of 22).
- Weakest: rear legroom (15th of 20, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $66,300 | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 4th of 15 | 79% | |
| Most horsepower | 523 hp | 8th of 24 | 65% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 33.9 cu ft | 7th of 22 | 71% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.4 in | 15th of 20 | 16% | |
| Max towing | 7,200 lb | 7th of 23 | 68% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 37.5 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 36.4 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 31.9 cu ft
Show all 22
- Jeep Wagoneer S 30.6 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Lexus RX 29.6 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 Coupe 29.3 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.3 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Honda Prologue 25.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 18.4 cu ft
- Polestar 3 17.1 cu ft
No figure: Genesis GV80, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree