Is the 2020 Volvo XC60 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
21stof 23
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.8 cu ft.
- 21st of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 22), towing (3rd of 22).
- Weakest: cargo (21st of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $40,150 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 2nd of 22 | 86% | |
| Most horsepower | 415 hp | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.8 cu ft | 21st of 23 | 9% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 13th of 23 | 45% | |
| Max towing | 5,291 lb | 3rd of 22 | 86% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model Y 68.0 cu ft
- Buick Envision 57.3 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 36.3 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
Show all 23
- Cadillac XT5 30.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Nexo 29.6 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- BMW X3 28.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q5 25.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.1 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 17.7 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.6 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz GLC.
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree