Is the 2023 Volvo XC60 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
23rdof 23
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.1 cu ft.
- 23rd of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (2nd of 17), mpg (3rd of 16).
- Weakest: cargo (23rd of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $43,450 | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 3rd of 16 | 80% | |
| Most horsepower | 455 hp | 5th of 24 | 78% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.1 cu ft | 23rd of 23 | 0% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 7th of 23 | 50% | |
| Max towing | 4,960 lb | 2nd of 17 | 94% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jaguar F PACE 31.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Nexo 29.6 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota Venza 28.8 cu ft
Show all 23
- BMW X3 28.7 cu ft
- Toyota bZ4X 27.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 25.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Nissan Ariya 22.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 18.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
No figure: VinFast VF8.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree