Is the 2026 Volvo XC60 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
23rdof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.1 cu ft.
- 23rd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (7th of 24), mpg (5th of 19).
- Weakest: cargo (23rd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49,700 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 5th of 19 | 72% | |
| Most horsepower | 455 hp | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.1 cu ft | 23rd of 24 | 4% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 8th of 22 | 43% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 9th of 18 | 29% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jeep Cherokee 33.6 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 32.1 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- BMW X3 31.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 30.9 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ 27.7 cu ft
- Audi Q5 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 27.6 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.4 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 25.4 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Acura ADX 24.4 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 13.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree