Is the 2026 Land Rover Discovery Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
1stof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 32.4 cu ft.
- 1st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 24), towing (1st of 14).
- Weakest: mpg (15th of 15).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49,900 | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Best combined mpg | 20 mpg | 15th of 15 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 246 hp | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 32.4 cu ft | 1st of 24 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.1 in | 4th of 23 | 77% | |
| Max towing | 4,409 lb | 1st of 14 | 100% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.4 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ 27.7 cu ft
- Audi Q5 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 27.6 cu ft
Show all 24
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 26.1 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree