Is the 2025 Volvo XC60 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
22ndof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.1 cu ft.
- 22nd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (3rd of 16), price (12th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (22nd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $47,050 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 3rd of 16 | 80% | |
| Most horsepower | 312 hp | 13th of 23 | 45% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.1 cu ft | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 6th of 22 | 52% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 11th of 17 | 31% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jaguar F PACE 32.1 cu ft
- BMW X3 31.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Audi Q6 e-tron 30.2 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ4X 27.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Audi Q5 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 27.6 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- Audi Q6 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 26.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Acura ADX 24.4 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 13.8 cu ft
- VinFast VF8 13.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree